Frances Haugen, the Facebook whistleblower who first got here ahead in an explosive “60 Minutes” interview, advised a Senate subcommittee on Tuesday that there’s “no one” holding Mark Zuckerberg accountable aside from himself.
“Facebook has not earned a right to just have blind trust in them,” Haugen mentioned. “Trust is … last week one of the most beautiful things I heard on the committee was trust is earned. And Facebook has not earned our trust.”
Haugen mentioned the firm suffered from “moral bankruptcy” and is “stuck in a loop it can’t get out of.”
Haugen labored as a product supervisor for the civic misinformation staff at Facebook for practically two years earlier than she give up in Might. Earlier than leaving, she mentioned she secretly copied tens of hundreds of pages of Facebook inside analysis, which she mentioned offers proof the firm has been mendacity to the public about making important progress in opposition to hate, violence and misinformation.
Haugen gave a lot of the paperwork to The Wall Avenue Journal, which revealed reporting on the analysis that confirmed the firm was conscious of the hurt it does to underage customers. She additionally shared the inside analysis with Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, and Senator Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, who’re each on the Senate subcommittee on Client Safety, Product Security and Information Safety. Haugen additionally filed a whistleblower grievance with the Securities and Trade Fee.
Whereas the listening to touched on a large swath of Facebook’s issues, it targeted on the platform’s influence on youngsters, coming after the firm paused its deliberate “Instagram for Kids” and every week after its world security head defended youngsters’s use of the platform. Haugen in contrast the platform to cigarettes, and a number of other lawmakers mentioned Facebook wanted to be handled like Massive Tobacco.
“Facebook understands that if they want to continue to grow, they have to find new users,” Haugen mentioned. “They have to make sure that that next generation is just as engaged on Instagram as the current one. And the way they’ll do that is by making sure that children establish habits before they have good self-regulation.”
Facebook went on the offense whereas Haugen testified, with spokespeople tweeting that she did not work on “child safety or Instagram or research these issues and has no direct knowledge of the topic from her work at Facebook.” The corporate additionally issued a press release after her testimony attempting to discredit her.
Facebook says Haugen mischaracterized the firm’s work
Facebook mentioned Tuesday that Haugen mischaracterized the firm’s work and stole the paperwork she was lawmakers.
“If one teen on Instagram is having a bad experience, we need to do better. That’s why we do the research. That’s why we’ve built new features and tools along the way, like hiding the like count on Instagram or giving people the ability to stop people who might bully or harass them,” Monica Bickert, VP of content material coverage at Facebook, mentioned in an interview with CBS Information congressional correspondent Kris Van Cleave.
Bickert argued that Facebook’s inside analysis confirmed that for a majority of teenagers scuffling with psychological well being and well-being points, Instagram makes it both higher or would not have materials influence. Nevertheless, the similar analysis – introduced to gentle due to Haugen – additionally discovered that for a 3rd of teenage women, Instagram makes physique picture points worse.
“We are doing the research exactly because we care about safety,” Bickert mentioned.
When requested about adjustments to the firm’s use of algorithms that decide what content material customers see on their feeds, Bickert mentioned “people can always turn it off” and added that the firm welcomes a dialog with lawmakers about adjustments to algorithmic rankings.
“We think that regulation about content on social media platforms is something that could be really beneficial for the public,” Bickert mentioned. “The government should have a voice here. We would like to be a part of the conversation,” she added.
In a separate written assertion, Lena Pietsch, Facebook’s director of coverage communication, mentioned that Haugen didn’t work on youngster questions of safety throughout her time at the firm and claimed she by no means attended decision-point conferences with high degree executives.
Pietsch mentioned Haugen, a former product supervisor at Facebook, solely labored at the firm for lower than two years. However the paperwork she offered to lawmakers help the allegations she is making.
“We don’t agree with her characterization of the many issues she testified about,” Pietsch mentioned, including that it is time for regulators to create a brand new algorithm for the web. “Instead of expecting the industry to make societal decisions that belong to legislators, it is time for Congress to act,” she mentioned.
Haugen says she opposes breaking up Facebook
Despite some lawmakers’ calls to split up Facebook, and the Federal Trade Commission’s pursuit of an antitrust case that could force the company to break up, Haugen said she doesn’t support breaking up the platform. In her view, a breakup wouldn’t solve the issues of algorithms making bad decisions on the platforms, but would simply shift most of the problems to Instagram, she testified.
“If you split Facebook and Instagram apart, it’s likely most of the advertising dollars go to Instagram, while Facebook continues to be this Frankenstein,” with not enough resources to address problematic content on the platform, she said. The “systems will still exist,” she added.
Instagram is the fastest-growing of Facebook’s properties. Its revenue, currently estimated around $40 billion, is also growing at about 40% year, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh previously told CBS News. That’s three times as fast as Facebook proper, and significantly more than digital advertising as a whole, which is growing at about 12% or 13% a year, Singh said.
“Have we seen a golden age of teen mental health over the past 10 years?” Haugen asks
Senator Cynthia Lummis asked Haugen what documents she would request from Facebook if she was a lawmaker. Haugen replied: “Any research on use, addictiveness of product, and what Facebook knows about parents’ lack of knowledge of the platform.”
Haugen said that in documents she read, parents were not aware of how “dangerous” Instagram is.
Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming, repeated that Facebook should be treated the same way as Big Tobacco.
Senator Dan Sullivan, Republican of Alaska, continued that line of questioning, asking whether in 20 years, Americans would look back and wonder “what the hell were we all thinking?”
Haugen also pushed back on Davis’ assertions last week that Facebook and Instagram helped lonely teens stay connected.
“When Facebook has made statements in the past about kids who were once alone, [I was] stunned about that,” Haugen mentioned. “If Instagram is a force, have we seen a golden age of teen mental health over the last 10 years? No — broad research shows social media amplifies risk- Facebook’s own research shows that. Kids are saying ‘I am unhappy when I use Instagram, I can’t stop, I’m afraid to be ostracized.'”
Haugen added that Facebook is “stuck in a loop that it can’t get out of.”
Congress likely to pass transparency laws: Bloomberg Intelligence
Despite Haugen’s explosive allegations and a steady chorus of bipartisan condemnation from lawmakers, it’s not certain that Tuesday’s hearing will result in new regulations for Facebook.
The most likely outcome is that lawmakers will demand more access to Facebook’s data, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matthew Schettenhelm said in a research note, calling it “the most legally defensible path for U.S. lawmakers.”
Directly regulating the content Facebook allows is unlikely, because “social-media companies have free-speech rights that generally protect their ability to air and even amplify distasteful messages and misinformation,” he wrote.
While such transparency could generate negative headlines for Facebook and other social media companies, it wouldn’t “directly alter the companies’ business models as direct limits on data use might,” he wrote.
Haugen emphasized this point in her testimony under questioning from Senator Ted Cruz. “Until we have transparency, we will not have a system compatible with democracy” and speaking in favor of a “regulatory body” that could force Facebook to disclose information, she said. “Right now no one can force Facebook to release data,” she said.
It’s also possible that Congress will update a 1998 law limiting how companies can use children’s data. Senator Ed Markey, one of the authors of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule, repeatedly said on Tuesday he wants to update it to apply to older teens, as well as to ban targeted ads to children and limit influencer content.
Facebook spokespeople criticize Haugen
As Haugen testified, Andy Stone, Facebook’s policy communications director, went on the offense. He tweeted that Haugen “did not work on child safety or Instagram or research these issues and has no direct knowledge of the topic from her work at Facebook.”
Despite criticism over the tweet, Stone repeated Haugen’s own responses to lawmaker’s questions, including a question from Senator Amy Klobuchar about teens being some of the platform’s most profitable users, to which she replied that she didn’t work on that.
Another Facebook spokesperson, Joe Osborne, tweeted that Facebook left in place some of the measures to safeguard against misinformation leading up to January 6 and that Haugen “didn’t work on these efforts.”
Haugen says “only Facebook knows how it personalizes your feed for you”
Haugen said “no one truly” understands the “destructive choices” made by Facebook except for Facebook. “Facebook’s closed design means it has no real oversight,” Haugen said. “Only Facebook knows how it personalizes your feed for you.”
Haugen said that in the end, “the buck stops with Mark” Zuckerberg, and no one is holding him accountable but himself.
“Mark Zuckerberg ought to be looking at himself in the mirror today,” she said. “And yet rather than taking responsibility and showing leadership, Mr. Zuckerberg is going sailing.”
Blumenthal said Zuckerberg’s new policy is “No apologies, No admissions. No acknowledgment.”
Problematic ads approved
Doubling down on the idea that Facebook can harm young users, Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, showed examples of three fake ads that Facebook approved, promoting anorexia and drug use.
One ad had the words “throw a Skittles party like no other” against an image of pills. Another contained advice on eating less, using common slang for anorexia. The words, against an image of a young woman’s bare stomach, read: “AnaTip #2: When you’re craving a snack, visit pro-ana sites to feed your motivation and reach your goal.”
The ads, which never ran, were created up by the Tech Transparency Project to draw attention to what the group said were holes in Facebook’s ad approval process. The TTP tried the experiment this spring and again in September; the ads were approved last month, the group said.
Responding to Lee’s question on how those ads could be approved, Haugen theorized that algorithms could be to blame.
While Haugen noted she never worked on the company’s ad approval team, she said, “Facebook has a deep focus on scale. Scale is, ‘can we do things cheaply for many people. That’s why they rely on AI. It’s possible none of those ads were seen by a human.”
Hate speech on the platform suffers from the same problem, she said. In a best-case scenario, Facebook catches 10 to 20% of hate speech, she said.
Whistleblower: 5% of teens “addicted”
Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen told lawmakers Tuesday that the social media company’s internal research shows at least 5% of teenagers on Instagram are addicted to the service and said it is likely that far more kids are hooked.
Haugen said Facebook is aware that its algorithms lead children from “very innocuous topics like healthy recipes” to “anorexia promoting content in a very short period of time.”
“Many of Facebook’s internal research reports indicate that Facebook has a serious negative harm on a significant portion of teenagers and younger children,” Haugen said.
Haugen also noted that Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who holds over 55% of voting shares in the company, is ultimately responsible for the decisions being made at the company.
“There is no one holding Mark [Zuckerberg] accountable however himself,” Haugen mentioned. “There is no unilateral responsibility, the metrics make the decisions,” she added.
How to watch Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen testify earlier than Senate committee
-
What: Frances Haugen testifies earlier than Senate subcommittee
-
Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2021
-
Time: 10 a.m. ET
-
Location: Russell Constructing – Washington, D.C.
-
On-line stream: Stay on CBSN in the participant above and in your cell or streaming system.
